• Home
• About
• Properties For Sale By City
  • Atherton
  • Los Altos
  • Menlo Park
  • Mountain View
  • Palo Alto
  • Other Cities
• Housing Price Trends

Subscribe

Change, Logic and Money

January is a month typically filled with many things inspirational, and I must say that January 2009 appears exceptional.  In listening to Obama’s inaugural speech on Tuesday, my own interpretation was, “The power of change begins with me.  With you.  The sooner we all believe that we can change things for the better, the sooner we ACT to make things better.”

 Would you like a tax credit of $7,500 for buying a home?  And I mean a REAL credit, not the 0.00% loan that the 2008 stimulus package was enactingfor firs time home buyers?  Well, that’s the latest possible modification going forward as part of the 2009 Stimulus Package, and it’s NOT limited to first time home buyers.  There’s discussion that ANYONE wanting to buy residential real estate will be entitled to this $7,500credit.   As you know, a tax credit directly offsets the amount of federal tax that you may owe the federal government—it’s not a reduction in taxable income—which makes this a very compelling reason for would be home seekers and investors to make a purchase this year.   

Want another compelling reason why the smart, savvy buyers are acting sooner than later?  Because they know that average appreciation rates in California are 8.8% over the last 40 years (yes we all know that the Peninsula is much greater), and today provide an opportunity for both tremendous value and cheap financing.  Let’s think about real value for a moment.  The last year we had average appreciation in California, it was the year 2001 (8.7%).  If we strip out the overbuilt areas of California.., and concentrate specifically on areas where housing expansion is extremely limited, like the Peninsula, one can simply take the median price of comparable homes in 2001, add 8.8% appreciation per year, depreciate appropriate improvements to the property and a value may be derived.  Thus, if a would-be buyer can obtain a home at that value or better, and combine the cheap cost financing, that’s an ideal move on a fundamental basis, whether the purchase is for shelter or for investment.

Want more?  OK.  How about the fact that, since 1968, there have only been four real periods of decline:  1984 (0.1%, so not really), 1990 (only 1.2%, despite the Loma Prieta earthquake in October 1989), 1992-1996 (Average of 2.44% despite a major recession following a major earthquake) and today (yes, believe it or not, there was NO decline for CA as a whole in 2001 when the stock market crashed; in fact, it was up 8.7% in 2001 and up over 20% in 2002. All the more reason why 2001 is a good basis to use.  

Want even more? “Thank you, Sir, may I have another?”  Sure.  How about the fact that I have personally bought at a low point (1994), sold and bought at a high point (2000), sold and bought at a mid point (2004) and came out ahead EVERY time.  In fact, that stepping-stone approach toward buying a home in Palo Alto without a trust fund was a goal realized solely because of real-estate appreciation.  On that note, let’s review again the fundamentals of buying real estate for both the person seeking shelter and the person seeking an investment. 

For those seeking shelter, it does not matter which price point one is buying at today, as there is good value on property and cheap money available now.   It also matters very little at this point whether we’re at the bottom of the current cycle.  The reality is that interest rates across the board, combined with attractive pricing, have made it far more financially advantageous to buy versus rent.  And with a 5-year holding period, equity is protected and an increase to net worth is likely.  For those looking to buy their primary residence, and who are also trying to time the market, they will likely be settling for less desirable property at a higher cost…    

For those seeking investment, there are properties everywhere that are positively cash flowing, thanks again to a strong combination of value and very cheap financing.   A recent example I looked at was a 4-plex here on the Peninsula going for about $900k, and it POSITIVELY cash flowed with only 10% down!  To boot, if the client had 30% to place, it would yield a capitalization rate of almost 3%– that’s HUGE for residential property investment on the Peninsula!   

What about financing?   Mortgage banks offer the greatest breadth and depth of available programs, but large institutions with reputable loan professionals are a good alternative .  As you may have heard this week, Chase is the latest major player to cease brokerage operations (yet they are still buying paper from mortgage banks) making it tougher for brokers to source money.  Rates on conforming programs have risen in recent weeks, but rates are still very attractive around 5%.  Further, rates on non-conforming/jumbo programs have also been very attractive at rates BELOW 5%.

Please keep in mind that seller financing is an ideal way for buyers to buy more valuable property while protecting their liquidity and sellers to obtain a great investment while selling their property at a reasonable price.   Many are waking up to this option, which will undoubtedly move greater inventory.

Comments

• Chat

• Market Stats

Copyright © 2008 3 Oceans Real Estate · Revolution News theme by Brian Gardner · San Francisco Commercial Real Estate · Log in