• Home
• About
• Properties For Sale By City
  • Atherton
  • Los Altos
  • Menlo Park
  • Mountain View
  • Palo Alto
  • Other Cities
• Housing Price Trends

Subscribe

Tax Credit Extended, Markets Further Stabilizing and Real Estate Ideal Hedge

Tax Credit and Conforming/FHA Loan Limit Extended

Made official on Friday, the tax credit for home purchases was extended through July 1, 2010 and the important details are exactly as they were in my post on Friday the 30th of October, which was summarized as follows:

· Effective on binding real estate contracts from December 1, 2009 through April 30, 2010, The tax credit would be $8,000 for first time home buyers and $6,500 for move-up buyers who have owned their current home for at least five years

· The tax credit expires on April 30, 2010; however, if a binding contract is reached by April 30, 2010, buyers have an additional 60 days to close the deal and still be eligible for the tax credit

· For purchases made in 2010, taxpayers would be able to claim the credit on their 2009 income tax return

· The income limits for both first time home buyers and move-up buyers would be $125,000 for single return and $225,000 joint return.

· Cost of the home may not exceed $800,000 to be eligible.

Remember that a tax credit has about THREE TIMES the impact of a tax deduction, which allows someone earning $125,000 per year to be taxed on about $102,000*. And since other items like interest and property taxes are also deductible*, that same individual may be looking at less than half of their earnings being fully taxable..!*

Add the above news to the fact HUD also extended the conforming loan limit of $729,750 in the Bay Area to December 31, 2010, and you have a “perfect storm” for every qualified first-time buyer in the Bay Area.

S&P Case-Shiller Confirming Further Improvement of Housing Prices

Released last week, the S&P Case-Shiller index confirms that housing prices continue to improve, especially in areas like San Francisco where the index moved another 2.8% in August to 132.47. This marks the seventh straight month of improvement.

Zillow also reported that their index reflected further stabilization for the third quarter, with over 26% of the metropolitan statistical areas showing signs of improvement.

Real Estate as an Ideal Hedge to Both the “W” Concern and Inflation

You may recall from my last post that we are seeing far more application activity for purchases in the $1mm+ range, especially the $1.5mm to $4mm range. These applications have been coming from our more financially-minded clients, as they not only see tremendous opportunity to obtain a more valuable home, but they are very concerned about a “W”-shaped economic recovery and subsequent inflation. As such, obtaining an upgraded home for less, cheap financing and hedging against inflation make buying a larger home an ideal move. All things being relative, the reality is that the S&P 500 currently has a rather high price-to-earnings ratio at about 19.52 versus the historical average of 15.7. As such, if we were in average economic circumstances, it’s arguable that the stock market is overvalued by about 25%. Given the fact that our current economy is FAR from being in average condition, it’s anyone’s guess just how overvalued the stock market is. All I know is that my savviest, financially-minded clients think that the stock market is due a correction and that real estate is a great asset to have as a hedge against both a market correction and inevitable inflation.

Fannie’s New Program: Deed for Lease

Announced on November 5, Fannie Mae is helping those qualified applicants to essentially sell and lease back their current home. This program is also applicable to investment-property owners who are facing foreclosure and wish to deed the property over to the lender and allow the renters to continue renting at market levels.

Rates and Activity

• Rates continue to run as low as 3.75%, depending on a number of different factors, with the conforming 30-year at just under 5% and the jumbo 30-year at about 4.75%
• 71% of our transactions last month were purchases, and the average loan was in the $500k range.
• As mentioned above, we’re seeing a heavy trend in purchase applications for the move-up market, but inventory is turning off a majority of those buyers
• We closed a deal in TWO weeks, but we still recommend a 30-day closing period
• If you or someone you know prefers to pay cash for a purchase, then finance that purchase within 90 days to protect valuable tax advantages, we can help, as we have programs that DO NOT require 6 months seasoning and pricing is based on purchase money, NOT a cash-out refinance

* Does not constitute tax advice.  Please seek any qualified tax professional for proper guidance.

Economic Forecast, Extending the Tax Credit and the Golden Window for Buyers

On October 12, I attended a SILVAR sponsored economic update and forecasting presentation by CAR EVP Joel Singer, and I thought you might find the following summary and comments beneficial:

• As we all know financing is the primary key to housing stability, and Singer is 100% confident that both tax credits and the $729,750 conforming limits will be extended into 2010—both of which are keys to continued recovery
  • 40% of first-time buyers for 2009 bought because of the tax credit
  • The Feds are on track to extend the credit, maybe even improve it, so let’s keep our fingers’ crossed
  • The CA State Senate already approved the extension of the state $10,000 tax credit, and it should pass Assembly this week—yeah!
  • Food for thought: before the competition increases due to formalizing the tax credits, first-timers should make their move sooner than later
• The move-up market here is the most impacted, but will improve as financing does; as such, he feels as though there will be some level of government involvement to stimulate the secondary market for non-conforming loans
  • Right now, inventory levels for $750k-$1mm are at 6.1 months, which is healthy; inventory levels for $1mm+ are at 12.8 months, which signals a clear buyers’ market
  • With government support, non-conforming lending will ease, but not necessarily cause rates to be lower—current margins are already at all-time highs primarily due to risk—by stabilizing the system and improving liquidity, risk is reduced, savings rates increase and rates remain about the same
• Futures point to a Fed funds rate rise of .500% to .750% and conforming 30-year fixed mortgages at 5.6% in Q2 2010
  • As such, this gives anyone needing a conforming loan about 5 months before both rates and prices are up significantly
  • And if you missed the headline on September 24th about the Fed easing their policy of keeping mortgage rates low, you’ll want to know that they are almost cutting in HALF the  the effort– $14B versus $25B
• The overall number of homes/units sold next year will be down, but that’s only because we had a record number of units sell already this year—foreclosures will be DOWN relatively significantly
  • Activity will still be high and it’s likely the $1mm+ segment that will provide buyers with the best value
  • The “second wave” of foreclosures due to rate adjustments is a farce—many people, like myself, are looking forward to loans adjusting at lower rates, which is precisely what the majority of those loans will do
• 2010 will be a growth year with GDP expected at about 1.9%
  • Great news for the economy, but growth causes higher prices and higher rates—
• The population of CA will grow another 1.1%, so that’s about $370,000
  • We’ve added about 600k people per year since 2000, and about 500k babies are born in CA each year, so I guess that means there will be more demand on housing, which is also good news
• Unemployment may be 12% in CA, but that number is tied mostly to construction-related industries. 
  • With High Tech, Finance, Exports and Travel all on the rise for the Bay Area, our property values and local economy should benefit significantly

The Latest on Rates and Activity

Even with the incredible rates that continue to drive the refinance market, over 50% of the transactions that we closed in September were purchase transactions.  Also of importance is the fact that of those purchase transactions, 35% were financed using “JUMBO” loans!   Jumbo 30-year fixed loans are running about 5.75% and that jumbo 5/1’s are around 4.50%.  And if you have a $417k conforming loan, 5/1’s are available at 3.75%!!

According to the MBAA, last week’s applications were down, but the four week moving average is up, along with interest rates (albeit slightly).  We’re seeing the opposite effect locally, but it’s likely due to the many move-up buyers looking to take advantage of the $1mm+ market through Winter.

Is it just me, or does it genuinely feel like the golden window of opportunity for buyers right now..?

A great success story for us lately included funding a loan for a borrower who had a 63% debt-to-income ratio.  We have also bridged three separate transactions that allowed buyers to move up without having to sell their current home first.  And finally, we improved a client’s credit score by 100 points and saved them over $8,000 by having an erroneous collection removed from their credit record.  So even with all the news headlining the challenges in the mortgage world, at least some great success stories continue to be made.

Tales From the Front – The World of Palo Alto Area Real Estate 10/16/09

Today was re-tour day in Palo Alto. When the price of a home is reduced, or the listing agent is trying to generate some interest in a stale listing, they “re-tour” it, or have it on broker’s tour again. Today we visited three great properties that are looking for new owners and are on tour following price reductions.

First up was a Crescent Park contemporary at 1012 Forest Avenue, listed by Alan Dunckel and Derk Brill of Alain Pinel Realtors in Palo Alto. Since there isn’t an actual Alain Pinel at that office, if you ask for him, you will be connected to Alan Dunckel, who is a nice guy and a good agent and his name is close enough. They have just reduced the price on this home from $2,395,000 to $2,195,000. Not bad for a 4 year old home in that neighborhood. It will have an open house on Saturday and Sunday from 1:30 to 4:30.

Next we moved a little South to 2145 Emerson Street in equally shi-shi Old Palo Alto. This newer traditional home is listed by Lisa Liu of Alain Pinel Realtors for $2,095,000, down from $2,295,000. At 2248sf on a 5000sf lot, it’s a cozy home, with great details, and great natural lighting. Open Sunday from 1:30 to 4:30.

Saving the best for last is my Intero colleague David Troyer’s listing at 75 Coronado Avenue in Los Altos. This new home is 6721 square feet on two levels on a 14233sf lot. Using modern Craftsman architecture and high ceilings, even the basement feels open and spacious, and it has great finishes and details throughout. Normally shown by appointment only, I’ll be there this Sunday from 1:30 to 4:30. Please stop by!

If you would like more information on any of these or other homes for sale in the area, send me an email, or call me at 650-450-0450.

Have a great weekend!

Tales From The Front – My world in real estate, October 9, 2009

I’m going back to some of our original content here on 3Oceans and providing some commentary on selected homes I saw today on Broker’s Tour that are worthy of mention to me. Thanks to JT for driving today, and Steve for navigational assistance.

I dragged my Los Altos compatriots to Palo Alto today to see a couple of fine homes from the 1930’s. Being an old house nut, 320 Kellogg Avenue, listed by Tim Trailer of Coldwell Banker in Palo Alto really captured my attention with its period details, classy kitchen remodel and the big soaking tub in the master suite. Set on nearly half an acre of Old Palo Alto, this fine property will only set you back $9,750,000.

Moving downmarket to 2050 Waverly Avenue, listed by Bonnie Bjorn of Coldwell Banker in Menlo Park is this beautifully restored Dutch Colonial, offered with the reduced price of $4,995,000. It’s less house and less land than Kellogg, but you don’t have the train noise, and I actually like the neighborhood better. Plus the almost $5million in change will get you a nice little place overlooking the fairway at Pebble Beach, or a small winery in Sonoma . . .

The highlight for me today was this newer Palo Alto Hills estate, listed by Grace Wu of Alain Pinel for $4,299,000. Almost two acres of land, sweeping views of the Hills, and a 3 car garage (must have!) make this a winner. No open houses, but I can set up a showing if you are interested.

Finally, a big shout out to David Chung of Alain Pinel for rocking his new Audi R8 on broker’s tour today! I think he is the new winner in the sexy Palo Alto Realtor Car competition. Eat your heart out Ken!

If you would like to see any of the homes I wrote about today, let me know.

Thanks for reading . . .

The Market Report – June 2009

I send my clients a monthly market update and thought I’d share it with the blogosphere. If you agree and think that I’m a genius, please comment below. If you disagree and think I’m an idiot, keep your thougths to yourself. You can send me an email to subscribe to your city of  interest (Atherton, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Menlo Park, Mountain View, or Palo Alto), and I’ll add you to my monthly update list. The commentary is as of June 1, 2009, that data is real-time.

 

May brought a ray of light into the local real estate market, as consumers, boosted by the rising stock market and low interest rates, began buying up homes on the market. Both Pending Sales and Pending Prices are up (see attached chart for a historical comparison), absorption numbers have outpaced new inventory both statewide and locally, and multiple offers on homes in Los Altos and Palo Alto have come back into play. At the low end, investors are superheating the Santa Clara and San Jose markets for single-family homes under $500,000, with many bank owned properties getting 20 – 30 mostly cash or all cash offers.

In general, prices are at about 2004 levels, and interest rates continue to hover near historic lows, with conforming loans under 5% for 30 years, and Jumbo loans staying around 6%. The big question on everyone’s’ mind is, “How long will this last?”

This past week we saw rates on the 10 year bond jump 0.5%, putting upward pressure on mortgage rates, which responded by rising for the different conforming loans. To get some additional input on whether this is short-term volatility or a longer term trend, I called my favorite mortgage bankers, who all had the same opinion, and all disagree (with all due respect) with Fed Chairman Bernanke that we will be out of the woods by the end of 2009.

The abridged version is that the government is subsidizing rates on loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (who are backed by taxpayers), so long-term mortgage rates are unsustainably low. The funds being used to subsidize these loans are finite, and limited, so there is upward pressure on the various conforming rates to rise to the real market rate of 6% as we are seeing in the Jumbo market.

Unusually, BOTH Buyers and Sellers are facing threats from market forces, creating compelling arguments to act now:

Sellers:

• Rising interest rates cut the purchasing power of Buyers, reducing the pool of potential Buyers for a given property
• The threat of rising unemployment and continuing slowing of the economy reduces consumer confidence and spending, especially on big-ticket items like cars and houses
• The current tax incentives for buying homes are limited to 2009. Reduced government from taxes due to lower incomes and corporate earnings makes it less likely that these are extended in 2010.

Buyers:

• That unemployment thing
• Qualifying for mortgages is getting more difficult, and the regulation of the process has tightened, adding new hurdles to the underwriting and appraisal process as the market overcorrects for the Wild West of the last few years.
• Rising rates cut purchasing power

Wow, kind of heavy stuff for a Friday. The good news is that summer is less than 3 weeks away!

 

On to the numbers:

 

Atherton:

Currently, the Median Price of a Single Family Home in Atherton is $3,996,500 with a range of $899,000 to 16,800,000. 48% (versus 41% last month) of the homes in Atherton have had price reductions, as Sellers are accepting that the market has shifted, and the average number of Days on Market has risen to 133 days from 114 last month, meaning that we should see more price reductions as the market searches for equilibrium.

 

 

Los Altos:

Currently, the Median Price of a Single Family Home in Los Altos is $1,999,900. 36% (up from 32% last month) of the homes in Los Altos have had price reductions, as Sellers are learning that the market has shifted, and the average number of Days on Market has dropped slightly to 98 days versus 96 last month.

 

 

Los Altos Hills:

Currently, the Median Price of a Single Family Home in Los Altos Hills is $3,146,500. 36% (up from 23% last month) of the homes in Los Altos Hills have had price reductions, as Sellers are learning that the market has shifted, and the average number of Days on Market has dropped to 173 days versus 187 last month.

 

 

Menlo Park:

Currently, the Median Price of a Single Family Home in Menlo Park is $1,447,000. 38% (versus 37% last month) of the homes in Menlo Park have had price reductions, as Sellers are resisting that the market has shifted, and the average number of Days on Market has risen to 127 days from 116 last month.

 

 

Mountain View:

Currently, the Median Price of a Single Family Home in Mountain View is $899,000. 55% (versus 38% last month) of the homes in Mountain View have had price reductions, as Sellers are learning that the market has shifted, and the average number of Days on Market has decreased to 121 days from 127 last month.

 

 

Palo Alto:

Currently, the Median Price of a Single Family Home in Palo Alto is $1,595,000. 41% (versus 43% last month) of the homes in Palo Alto have had price reductions, as Sellers are resisting accepting that the market has shifted, and the average number of Days on Market has risen to 99 days from 94 last month.

 

Bamboo is the New Granite (Extended Remix Version) — A Contemporary Townhome in Downtown Palo Alto

Michael Hall and I had a lot of fun putting together our first property video review, and now that we’ve worked the kinks out, we thought we’d give it another spin, with more detail. Wellcomemat allows you to create “chapters” within the video so you can jump from one place to another. Very neat!

Interestingly, the first post sparked an email conversation with some folks about countertops: Is bamboo really the new granite?

One emailer had this to say:

Don’t believe everything you hear! It discolors easily, needs to be sealed annually, and can chip/crack. Composite stone is the new granite.

Somebody else said:

I hear concrete is the new kitchen counter granite. Next it will be back to those laminate ones…I don’t even remember what it’s called!

Part 2: There’s always a story in the numbers…creating FUD from that story is the media’s job; making sense from it is mine

A friend of mine named Eilam, also a numbers sort of guy, made an interesting comment about my previous post in which I dissected the year-to-date real estate numbers for Palo Alto, CA. He challenged me to look still deeper into the numbers and try to figure out whether I had the cause-and-effect in the right order.

I essentially asserted that, “Homebuyers were buying increasingly smaller homes from January to July, and increasingly larger homes thereafter, and that’s what led to prices going down between January to July, and upwards thereafter.”

Eilam asks if instead it might be this way around: “From January to July, homebuyers decided they wanted to buy less expensive homes, so they simply bought smaller ones. Thereafter, they loosened the purse strings, and therefore bought more.”

His exact quote:

Thanks. Good analysis.

However – it does beg a follow-on question. What can we learn from the down-tick and later up-tick in sizes of houses being sold ? Is there rhyme-and-reason underling the observed trend (which you very accurately analyzed) ?

I think ’sizes=total price’ (i.e. it isn’t that people are all of a sudden interested in larger or smaller houses at certain times of the year).

What is interesting to ask is: is this a pattern change in demand or in supply (i.e. is the reason smaller houses were selling for a while because larger ones were not on the market, or because they were on the market but people were not buying ?).

Also – what would be interesting is to overlay it with a possible ‘culprit’: interest rates.
Is the swing in ‘house sizes’ (again in my mind possibly an ‘alter-ego’ of total-purchase-price) correlated to changes in interest rates ?

Eilam

Great question — I would have expected nothing less from Eilam — and my answer for now is, “I’m not really sure.”
Here’s what I (think I) know and don’t know so far:

1. Since Altos Research’s data only goes back a year, I’ll have to go to another data source to find out if this is a seasonal trend — ie for whatever reason, people buy increasingly smaller homes in the first half of the year, and increasingly larger homes later on. I strongly, strongly doubt that’s the case. I have the data that will answer that question locked up in a 250MB Access database, but I haven’t had time to release and analyze it.
2. Interest rates may indeed be the reason. I don’t have a quick-and-dirty way of putting interest rates and Altos Research data on the same graph, so for now this will have to do:
   
   Palo Alto median home prices:
   Interest rates (from Freddi Mac)
   

   30-year fixed mortgage rates climbed steadily from 6.15% in January to 6.76% in July, and then crept down to 6.40% in September. As mortgage rates were climbing, home prices were going down, and when mortgage rates started going back down, home prices started going back up. Eilam’s theory may indeed be correct in that prospective homebuyers ratcheted down their size requirements to stay within a budget.

3. If this theory is correct, we should see a similar pattern in other towns. The results below don’t show a similar pattern; I’ve included towns both more and less expensive than Palo Alto.Menlo Park:
   
   
   Los Altos:
   Woodside:
   

   Redwood City:
   

4. Conclusion? I’m still not sure! Possibilities:
   • It’s unlikely that Palo Alto home buyers are more interest-rate sensitive than their neighbors in Menlo Park, Redwood City, Los Altos, and Woodside.
   • It’s possible that people who buy homes during the school year tend to have fewer or no kids and thus need less space, and those who buy during the summer tend to have more kids and need more space. Sounds like a good theory, but wouldn’t it be the same for other towns as well?
   • It may just be something completely random, an artifact of the characteristics of the homebuyers that happened to be on the market in Palo Alto this year.

There’s always a story in the numbers…creating FUD from that story is the media’s job; making sense from it is mine

If there’s one thing I learned from my tenure in consulting (apart from the names of the cabin crew on the mid-Sunday afternoon American Airlines flight from SFO to JFK…) it’s that the numbers always tell a story.

Remember this neat little chart from our little “Frolick with the data” yesterday, provided by those whiz-bang numbers folks at Altos Research?

Statistically-challenged reporters (is there another kind?) look at this and concoct two dramatic headlines, depending on whether you look before or after July 2006: “Prices drop dramatically!” or “Prices increase dramatically!”

Both headlines are, technically, true — in the same sense that your favorite team’s one-game loss could be a “losing streak” and a one-game win could be a “winning streak.”

What’s behind these numbers?

Quite simple: The variation in prices this year in Palo Alto is due nearly entirely to the difference in home size. Put another way, home prices fell between January and July because smaller homes were selling, and home prices rose between July and October because larger homes were selling. Boring facts like that don’t sell newspapers, however, which is why you’d never get an explanation like that in the San Jose Mercury News.

Check this out:

From January to July, median prices dropped 17%, most steeply between January and May, and less steeply from May through July. From July till now, prices have increased 13%.

Now let’s look at what happened to median home sizes during that time:

Uncanny, isn’t it? From January to July, we get a 20% drop in median square footage, and again we have a more steep decline from January to May, and a less steep one from May to July. From July till now, we have a 13% rise.

The fall and rise of median property prices matched nearly identically the fall and rise of median home sizes. The mild difference between the two sets of numbers — a 20% drop in sizes, but only a 17% drop in prices — is fully explained by the differences in price per square foot:

So what’s the real story? It’s not “Prices are falling!” or “Prices are rising!” but something far more boring and completely unlikely to sell newspapers: The price per square foot of homes in Palo Alto has stayed pretty much the same this year, varying by less than 3%. For the first 7 months, there was a steady 20% decline in the size of homes being sold, followed by a steady 13% increase in size.

• Chat

• Market Stats

Copyright © 2008 3 Oceans Real Estate · Revolution News theme by Brian Gardner · San Francisco Commercial Real Estate · Log in