Buydowns and the Bottom

March 31, 2009

If you were in the market to buy a $2,000,000 home home in the Bay Area, would it make a differnce to you if the monthly investment was less than $5,000 with a 30% down payment?   And I’m not just talking about the mortgage payment, I am talking about complete, tax adjusted cash flow including a 4.25% 30-year mortgage fixed for 10 years, property taxes and homeowners insurance.  Sound too good to be true?  It’s not.  And yes it beats market rental rates by thousands.

Interest-rate buydowns are one of the most effective methods for both buyers and seller to obtain what they want, which of course is value.  For the sellers, buying down an interest rate can have up to 8X the power over a price reduction, depending on the cost to buy the rate down.  For buyers, a lower rate means higher qualification and bragging rights of having the lowest mortgage rate on the planet.  In the example above:

  • If the buyer was qualified up to $1.8mm at 5.5%, they are now qualified at $2mm at 4.25%
  • The seller only needs to invest four points or $56,000 to move the buyer $200,000; thus a $56,000 investment saves the seller about $144,000, which is therefore about FOUR TIMES more effective than reducing price

I use the example above since I have been receiving a tremendous amount of inquiries about what’s happening at the higher end, which are those homes selling at $1.5mm+, and whether creative financing has been more common than not.  What we’re seeing is that creative financing, like interest rate buydowns and seller financing, are definitely more common at all price points.   But what’s been rather fascinating to watch is that many sellers are becoming less inclined to reduce price, despite the fact that prices are off by between 7% to 17%, depending on which city the property i located.  Yet, sellers have been very open to concessions that help them keep their price, despite the net proceeds being reduced.  One of the reasons for this, in my opinion, is the fact that buying activity has skyrocketed on the last few weeks, which is obviously encoraging to sellers.

So what’s drivng the buying activity?  Well, for starters,  it seems like many buyers properly sensed that we’ve hit the proverbial “bottom” of the real estate market, which was recently confirmed ed by the exisitng home sales figures that came out last week.  That’s right, not only are sales of both exisiting and new homes up significantly (4.7% and 5.1% respectively), the US median price and average price were both up in February over January.   Add this data to the fact that interest rates have set a new low record, plus further validation from one of most respected economic forecasting sources avalable, the UCLA forecast, that 2010 will be a year of recovery, and it becomes clearer and clearer that there couldn’t be a greater opprtunity to buy real estate.

No tag for this post.

Written by Eric Trailer, Mortgage Banker, Absolute Mortgage Banking · Filed Under Business of real estate, Buyer, Buyers, Consumer, Industry, Mortgage, Real estate, Seller, Sellers | 1 Comment 

Change, Logic and Money

January 23, 2009

January is a month typically filled with many things inspirational, and I must say that January 2009 appears exceptional.  In listening to Obama’s inaugural speech on Tuesday, my own interpretation was, “The power of change begins with me.  With you.  The sooner we all believe that we can change things for the better, the sooner we ACT to make things better.”

 Would you like a tax credit of $7,500 for buying a home?  And I mean a REAL credit, not the 0.00% loan that the 2008 stimulus package was enactingfor firs time home buyers?  Well, that’s the latest possible modification going forward as part of the 2009 Stimulus Package, and it’s NOT limited to first time home buyers.  There’s discussion that ANYONE wanting to buy residential real estate will be entitled to this $7,500credit.   As you know, a tax credit directly offsets the amount of federal tax that you may owe the federal government—it’s not a reduction in taxable income—which makes this a very compelling reason for would be home seekers and investors to make a purchase this year.   

Want another compelling reason why the smart, savvy buyers are acting sooner than later?  Because they know that average appreciation rates in California are 8.8% over the last 40 years (yes we all know that the Peninsula is much greater), and today provide an opportunity for both tremendous value and cheap financing.  Let’s think about real value for a moment.  The last year we had average appreciation in California, it was the year 2001 (8.7%).  If we strip out the overbuilt areas of California.., and concentrate specifically on areas where housing expansion is extremely limited, like the Peninsula, one can simply take the median price of comparable homes in 2001, add 8.8% appreciation per year, depreciate appropriate improvements to the property and a value may be derived.  Thus, if a would-be buyer can obtain a home at that value or better, and combine the cheap cost financing, that’s an ideal move on a fundamental basis, whether the purchase is for shelter or for investment.

Want more?  OK.  How about the fact that, since 1968, there have only been four real periods of decline:  1984 (0.1%, so not really), 1990 (only 1.2%, despite the Loma Prieta earthquake in October 1989), 1992-1996 (Average of 2.44% despite a major recession following a major earthquake) and today (yes, believe it or not, there was NO decline for CA as a whole in 2001 when the stock market crashed; in fact, it was up 8.7% in 2001 and up over 20% in 2002. All the more reason why 2001 is a good basis to use.  

Want even more? “Thank you, Sir, may I have another?”  Sure.  How about the fact that I have personally bought at a low point (1994), sold and bought at a high point (2000), sold and bought at a mid point (2004) and came out ahead EVERY time.  In fact, that stepping-stone approach toward buying a home in Palo Alto without a trust fund was a goal realized solely because of real-estate appreciation.  On that note, let’s review again the fundamentals of buying real estate for both the person seeking shelter and the person seeking an investment. 

For those seeking shelter, it does not matter which price point one is buying at today, as there is good value on property and cheap money available now.   It also matters very little at this point whether we’re at the bottom of the current cycle.  The reality is that interest rates across the board, combined with attractive pricing, have made it far more financially advantageous to buy versus rent.  And with a 5-year holding period, equity is protected and an increase to net worth is likely.  For those looking to buy their primary residence, and who are also trying to time the market, they will likely be settling for less desirable property at a higher cost…    

For those seeking investment, there are properties everywhere that are positively cash flowing, thanks again to a strong combination of value and very cheap financing.   A recent example I looked at was a 4-plex here on the Peninsula going for about $900k, and it POSITIVELY cash flowed with only 10% down!  To boot, if the client had 30% to place, it would yield a capitalization rate of almost 3%– that’s HUGE for residential property investment on the Peninsula!   

What about financing?   Mortgage banks offer the greatest breadth and depth of available programs, but large institutions with reputable loan professionals are a good alternative .  As you may have heard this week, Chase is the latest major player to cease brokerage operations (yet they are still buying paper from mortgage banks) making it tougher for brokers to source money.  Rates on conforming programs have risen in recent weeks, but rates are still very attractive around 5%.  Further, rates on non-conforming/jumbo programs have also been very attractive at rates BELOW 5%.

Please keep in mind that seller financing is an ideal way for buyers to buy more valuable property while protecting their liquidity and sellers to obtain a great investment while selling their property at a reasonable price.   Many are waking up to this option, which will undoubtedly move greater inventory.

No tag for this post.

Written by Eric Trailer, Mortgage Banker, Absolute Mortgage Banking · Filed Under * Top Category used for navbar, * Type of Content, Articles, Buyer, Buyer and seller tips, Buyers, Consumer, Industry, Los Altos, Mortgage, Mortgages, Real estate | 3 Comments 

Right Along With the Grunge Look, the Housing Crisis is Over

May 28, 2008

Yes, for those of you gents who still may be holding on to the rather relaxed “grunge” look from the 1990’s, I’ve got a newsflash for you: grunge, along with the current housing crisis, is over.  

Articles about the housing crisis ending have been few and buried in their respective periodical, my favorite of which was in TIME magazine back in February titled, “Ignore the Headlines“.  But now we have the Wall Street Journal. claiming that the trough was reached in April with an article from May 6, “The Housing Crisis is Over“.

I agreed with Peter Lynch back in February.., and it’s becoming more an more apparent that the longer prospective home-buyers sit on the fence, the more expensive that home purchase will become.  And this is not just because I believe that home prices will rise, it’s also because I believe that both long and short term interest rates will rise.  The 10-year Treasury Note, for example, is up over 1/2% since the middle of March, and the 10-year Treasury Note is a decent barometer to use when you want to know what the trend in long term mortgage rates have been.

That written, if you really want to continue with the grunge look, might I suggest saving it for your next camping trip?

As always, kindly consult with your trusted real estate, tax and mortgage professional before seriously considering any home purchase.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Written by Eric Trailer, Mortgage Banker, Absolute Mortgage Banking · Filed Under Articles, Buyer and seller tips, Consumer, For buyers, Industry, Mortgages, Real estate | 8 Comments 

Eliot Spitzer and Making Sense of the New Conforming Loan Limits

March 18, 2008

If you’re Eliot Spitzer, probably three feelings come to mind: panic, disorientation and regret.  But if you’re a potential home buyer in the Peninsula region of California, you have good reason to feel excited, encouraged and confident!  Why?  If you read my last post last month, you know that the conforming loan limits for many California Counties are going up and that means cheaper mortgage rates on loan amounts between $417,001 and $729,750.  Now that HUD has made it official that ALL bay Area counties qualify for the revised maximum conforming loan limit, that means potentially big savings on mortgages for qualified applicants looking to purchase single-unit properties up to $810,000 with as little as 10% down!

We’ve all heard the cliche, “the devil’s in the details”, so what are the latest requirements to obtain a conforming loans between $417,001 and $729, 750?  Since I’ll provide you with a link to Fannie Mae website and announcement , I’ll provide you with some highlights that I think are most relevant and let you read further at your leisure:

1. Single-unit properties only

2. Purchase and “limited cash out” transactions only (i.e. no greater than $2,000 going into your pocket upon settlement)

3. If primary residence purchase, up to 90% loan-to-value (”LTV”) allowed if fixed-rate program is selected–700 minimum FICO(R) required; 80% LTV if an adjustable-rate loan is selected–660 minimum FICO(R) required; if refinance

4. If second home or investment property purchase, maximum 60% LTV allowed with minimum 660 FICO(R) regardless of eligible loan program selected

5. If refinance, regardless of type of eligible mortgage program, up to 75% LTV allowed, plus subordinate financing allowed in addition up to 20% LTV–660 minimum FICO(R) required

     a. SPECIAL NOTE, consolidating existing first mortgage and subordinate mortgage into one loan NOT eligible AND six  months of “seasoning” (six payments made on existing mortgage) required to refinance!

6. Loans are eligible for origination NOW 

7. Eligible programs include 30-year fixed, 15-year fixed, LIBOR-based 5/1 ARM (amortized and interest-only payments allowed for this program)– more programs may become available

8. Sufficient employment, income and assets must be verified and each file will require manual underwriting– automated underwriting engines not allowed at this time

Again, I do encourage you to read the Fannie Mae announcement from the 6th of March for all the details, but the above are the top highlights.

So what will pricing look like on these “new” conforming mortgages?  Well, pricing has just recently been released by only a few institutions, but it looks like the 30-year fixed is running at about 6.375% and the 15-year fixed is running at about 6.25%.  The 5/1 ARM pricing is expected to be released next month.  What I do think is that pricing may actually get a little better in the short term as more institutions post pricing and auctions are successful with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 

What’s right for you as a would be home buyer on the Peninsula?  That depends of course on your specific situation, and I do encourage you to consult with your trusted mortgage and financial consultant before placing an offer on a home or refinancing your mortgage.  What I can say is that the majority of our clients who are buying or refinancing today are selecting a jumbo 5-year ARM in the mid-5% range due to its balance of savings, security and flexibility.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Written by Eric Trailer, Mortgage Banker, Absolute Mortgage Banking · Filed Under * Type of Content, Buyer, Buyers, Consumer, Industry | 5 Comments 

How Stimulating Will Raising the Conforming Loan Limit Be?

February 21, 2008

All hail our legislative and executive branches for passing into law the latest shot of adrenaline to our economy: the 2008 stimulus package. And it looks like a record was set with how fast the bill became law– wow, pretty impressive… Efforts like providing consumers with tax refund checks and businesses with additional write-offs should certainly inject the economy with billions of dollars, but many have asked me how raising the conforming loan limit, especially in CA, will truly stimulate the economy. Further, many of those have asked me whether it’s really the right thing to do.

Let’s start with whether it’s the right thing to do. Probably one of the better arguments against raising the conforming loan limit is the fact that doing so seems to reward those institutions and individuals that/who put us into this mess. If estimates by the National Association of Realtors is correct, 500,000 refinance transactions will be generated, 300,000 additional homes will be purchased and 210,000 foreclosures will be avoided. So if we conservatively estimate the revenue generated and the losses avoided using industry standards, the total is over 40 billion dollars! $40 billion certainly helps answer the question of how such an effort helps the economy; but again, why help those who caused billions of dollars of losses and a turned the market upside down? Shouldn’t we be punishing those bad, bad people and institutions? Well, the truth is that many of those institutions and individuals have gone away or moved on. So let’s take a moment to see what’s being created here.

Raising the conforming loan limit has the following benefits:

  1. It does in fact greatly stimulate the economy
  2. Many consumers who got in over their head will now be able to afford their mortgage
  3. Greater affordability for housing is created
  4. It will influence a portion of the jumbo market that has been lost and create some investor confidence, and finally
  5. California has been long overdue to have a raise to the conforming limit given that over 50% of the nation’s jumbo mortgages were originated in California.

Okay, let’s say that raising the conforming loan limit is good for a moment. What’s next and what are the details? There’s still some speculation, but here goes:

  1. The conforming loan amount will be determined based on 125% of the median price of a given county…
  2. This allowance will NOT go into effect for purchase or refinance transactions until July 1, 2008 (that’s the earliest date that the loan application may be signed) since the market needs from now to June 30, 2008 to liquidate current qualifying mortgages available for sale from institutions
  3. The types of programs allowed will be fixed-rate programs on a full-doc basis, which means that the hybrid, interest-only programs using “stated” income will not be allowed
  4. The property must be single-family and owner occupied, which means that 2nd homes, investment properties and multi-unit properties are ineligible
  5. Credit scores must be “reasonable” with a combined loan-to-value not to exceed 90%
  6. No cash-out, which means that a refinance may not allow the borrower to receive any greater than $2,000 at closing
  7. Loans must be funded and closed prior to December 31, 2008

The last question really has to do with what pricing of conforming loans will look like come July 1, 2008. My prediction is that, all things being equal today, that conforming loan rates will increase and that jumbo loan rates will decrease, leaving a much smaller margin between conforming and jumbo loans in the future. Since all things won’t be equal due to decreased short-term rates by the Fed and the overall stimulus package helping the economy, conforming loan rates will increase greater than jumbo loan rates will decrease. So, if you’re buying closer to the conforming level today, you’re better off getting a mortgage for the long term; if you’re at the jumbo level today, you’re likely better off going more for a short-term solution. Of course always consult closely with your mortgage, tax and legal professional for the best advice as it relates to your individual situation.

Tags: , , , , ,

Written by Eric Trailer, Mortgage Banker, Absolute Mortgage Banking · Filed Under Buyer, Buyers, Consumer, Industry, Mortgage, Real estate | 9 Comments 

How NOT to Let Great Rates Hold Up Your Closing

January 22, 2008

I recently read a great post from Dan Green, a mortgage planner in Ohio, titled, “While Rates Are Low, Schedule Your Purchase Closing At Least 45 Days Out “, and I wanted to remind any potential home buyers searching within or around Palo Alto, CA that local sellers are still requiring a 30-day or less close. Thanks to our main man, Dr. Boer, for bringing this blog to my attention.

Dan does have some great points about turn times deteriorating, underwriters being more cautious and resources being slimmer. All of these concerns are valid and may press the close date on any transaction. Thus, it’s important to verify with whomever you select as your lender what the timetable looks like for your situation. As a general rule, purchase transactions are given higher priority than refinance transactions.

The reality is that we have worked on two transactions already this month where the close date was ten days or less from contract ratification. In fact, one call I received yesterday asked whether a month-end close would be possible for a client looking to buy a condo in Menlo Park. Yes, a one-week close is possible.

So how can you prepare, and whom can you trust to get your transaction done right and on time? I offer the following:

1. if you have a trusted mortgage lending source, double check to determine whether the institution makes direct lending decisions (usually a direct lender or a mortgage bank)

2. if your trusted source does not make direct decisions (usually a mortgage broker), request a realistic timetable to determine whether your loan will fund in the time required by the contract

3. ask your real estate professional for a referral to a lender that she or he trusts

No doubt, this is a fantastic time to be buying a home: there a some local values out there, rates are phenomenally low (have you seen that 5-year treasury lately, wow! And what a move by the Fed to lower another .75%..!) and our local economy is doing well (check out Iverson’s latest post for more on that subject). The flip side is that the inventory of available homes has not been very encouraging (only four new ones in Palo Alto on Friday– ouch).

My position has always been that you can’t go wrong with purchasing real estate in select areas of the peninsula, provided that your holding period is five years. And if you’re someone with a reliable real estate professional, a reliable lender, reasonable qualifications and a solid plan, you will likely see a nice bump to your net worth over the next five years by making a move sooner than later.

Tags: , ,

Written by Eric Trailer, Mortgage Banker, Absolute Mortgage Banking · Filed Under Consumer, Industry, Mortgage, Real estate | Leave a Comment 

A Dirty Little Secret About Subprime Mortgages

January 14, 2008

Being a mortgage banker , I’ve done my fair share of researching the impact of the current “Mortgage Meltdown”, but what I haven’t seen publicly written is one very dirty little secret about the way most subprime mortgages were structured. So I’ve come to share. Hats off to Chris Iverson of the Ventoux Real Estate Group, by the way, for doing a superb job on his Mortgage Mania series.

I will never forget the first subprime mortgage solution that I originated. It was about three years ago, the mirror was officially fogged by the client, and the terms looked something like this:

–first mortgage for $400,000 at 80% loan-to-value, 30-year period, fixed for two years at 8.00%, interest-only payments allowed, 2% discount fee, with a three-year prepayment penalty at six months interest

–second mortgage for $100,000 at 20% loan-to-value, 15-year term, fixed for 15 years at 12%, amortized payments, 1% discount fee, no prepayment penalty

What a minute, a mortgage fixed for two years, but the prepayment penalty lasts for three years? Wait another minute, don’t the payments on that first mortgage double in the third year? Yes and yes.

I wasn’t aware that the first mortgage had a prepayment penalty beyond the fixed-rate period until the final loan documents were prepared. As you may imagine, after reading the documents I made an immediate phonecall to the lender that I had brokered the deal to (oh, and yes, that company is BK) and re-negotiated the prepayment penalty to two years without any additional cost.

The truth is, as I further investigated subprime lending, I discoverd that most of those loans were structured that way, and most were not re-negotiated…

So if borrowers were essentially set up for failure, doesn’t that have a domino effect to the lender that issued the paper and the investor that bought that paper? Yes. And that’s why we’re here today. That’s also why we originated as few of these loans as practical.

The reality was that modern subprime lending (modern in that it used to be called “hard money” and the loan-to value requirements were 65%-70% of property value) actually seemed like a win:win in the beginning. Think about it for a moment. To those who were willing to buy, but had serious financial difficulties, subprime lending was a great financing vehicle to own the American Dream or maybe begin investing in real estate . To the investor, it was a low-risk, secured investment that would earn a hefty 11+% yield. Oooops, maybe it wasn’t so obvious a win:win.

We can blame whomever we wish for the current mortgage mess: the rating agencies, Wall Street, big banks, small banks, mortgage banks, mortgage brokers, real estate professionals, borrowers, etc. My feeling is that all of the above share in the blame since it allowed all parties to get greedy. And might we all agree that greed can be a very dangerous motivation?

Tags: , , ,

Written by Eric Trailer, Mortgage Banker, Absolute Mortgage Banking · Filed Under Consumer, Industry | 3 Comments