• Home
• About
• Properties For Sale By City
  • Atherton
  • Los Altos
  • Menlo Park
  • Mountain View
  • Palo Alto
  • Other Cities
• Housing Price Trends

Subscribe

Mortgage Mania 26 - …And Henry Giveth Again

You would have to be living under a rock to have missed this today, so here is a newsflash for all you subterranian dwellers. Henry Paulson’s latest bailout plan now consists of borrowing $800 Billion from The Fed to buy up mortgage assets, consumer credit card debt and car loans.

In his article, “Fed bets $800 billion on consumers“ on CNNMoney today, writer Chris Isidore shares Uncle Henry’s latest plans:

“The Federal Reserve and Treasury Department on Tuesday unveiled a plan to pump $800 billion into the struggling U.S. economy in an attempt to jumpstart lending by banks to consumers and small businesses.

The government hopes that these initiatives will enable more money to flow to consumers in the form of loans than has occurred so far in previous bailout plans.

One program will make $200 billion available from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to holders of securities backed by consumer debt, such as credit cards, car loans and student loans.

The Treasury Department will allocate $20 billion to back that lending in order to cover any losses that the New York Fed might suffer.

In addition, the Federal Reserve, announced it will purchase up to $500 billion in mortgage backed securities that have been backed by Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500), Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) and Ginnie Mae, the three government-sponsored mortgage finance firms set up to promote home ownership. It will also buy another $100 billion in direct debt issued by those firms.”

Hmmm, buying mortgage backed securities . . . wasn’t that how TARP was sold to Congress in the first place? The idea of the US Government buying up toxic mortgage assets in an attempt to get the three remaining solvent banks to start underwriting mortgages is enough to get any red-blooded Realtor’s blood pumping again. If this restarts the housing market, let’s all be sure to thank the lobbyists working for NAR, and remember them on our Christmas lists.

The Fed goes the original plan one better by setting aside $200 Billion to buy securities backed by auto loan and credit card debt. Hmmm, let me see if I get this straight . . .

The idea behind mortgage backed securities was that they were safe because they were backed by the houses those mortgages were written against, and the logic was that those were APPRECIATING assets. This worked great until housing prices started falling, and the underlying assets were worth LESS than the loans on them.

A car drops 20% in value the minute you drive it off the lot, so you are already upside down on the loan if you put down less than 20%. The car ads are all touting $0 down, so let’s assume that most buyers today are putting down less than 20%. So . . . is this Groundhog Day?

Don’t get me started on buying credit card debt . . .

This is another reason I don’t work in the Treasury Department. That, and that pesky question about blog articles that would embarrass the President.

You can read the full text of the article HERE.

Thanks for reading . . .

Tags: 2008 real estate market, Fed bailout, mortgage bailout, mortgage crisis, mortgage mania

Mortgage Mania 25 - Now What?

Henry giveth, and Henry taketh away . . .

When Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson asked Congress for $750 Billion (yes, that’s with a B) financial bailout package, the justification was to buy up distressed mortgage assets so that banks would start lending again, and hopefully the epidemic of foreclosures sweeping the nation would be stalled.

The new plan doesn’t include that, of course, which has led to everyone asking, now what?

Lately, I have been holding open houses in Palo Alto pretty regularly, and almost everyone coming in asks me the same question: How is the Market? We discuss the market trends of homes taking longer to sell, increasing numbers of price reductions, the importance of pricing and preparation, etc.

The big shift we are seeing now is the effect of the stock market crash last month. Much of the wealth in Silicon Valley is tied to the stock market (options, grants, etc.). It’s how we pay our executives and employees, reward performance (bonuses), and fuel the venture capital engine. When the market drops over 30%, suddenly, potential home buyers are faced with the prospect of selling stock that is devalued by 30% to pull together the down payment on a home that is priced 5 - 10% off its high (typical Palo Alto home, your results may vary). That is pretty tough to justify, and in many cases potential buyers don’t have enough in their portfolios any more to cover the 20 - 30% down needed for that typical Palo Alto home.

So, we are seeing a bunch of Buyers exiting the market, while the inventory of homes for sale in Palo Alto is about double what it was at this time last year. The result is a Buyer’s Market. Good news if you are a Buyer, bad news if you are a Seller.

Many people in Palo Alto don’t NEED to sell their homes. They may be retired and wanting to move to a smaller home or relocate, or they may be a growing family needing more space. With the exceptions of people relocating out of the area, moving into retirement homes, or those who are selling for financial reasons, many sellers can afford to wait for the market to turn in their favor.

In the short-term, I predict that we will see the inventory of homes for sale drop, even more than the usual seasonality, as potential sellers wait out the market. The big threat to sales and prices is interest rates rising. Remember, that if the rate on a loan goes from 6% to 7%, the payment goes up about 15%. That is a big hit when you are talking about $1M loans, and a economy falling into recession.

For the longer term outlook, I’ll defer to this article that was recently in Money magazine that discusses how the credit crisis nationally is affecting ALL real estate, even here in Palo Alto. We Realtors love to say “All Real Estate is Local”, which is great unless the money to buy that local real estate is affected but national events. This time around, the events are international.

Be sure to follow the links above to see the latest market data for Palo Alto and the surrounding communities, but you may want to fix a drink first. Or, you can register to receive updates on the market in local communities delivered to your email weekly at: www.REMarketReports.com

Thanks for reading . . .

Tags: 2009 forecast, 2009 interest rates, home prices, housing market, housing market turnaround, palo alto economy, Palo alto housing market, palo alto real estate market, recession

McCain’s debate night bombshell

Did you see the debate last night?

During one of the questions about the economy and the financial crisis, McCain dropped a bombshell!

When Tom Brokaw asked about what needs to be done to help the housing market, McCain suggested that Government should buy back all these defaulted loans and then give these people new loans at the current market value of the home. Hmmmm. Will this work? I think not. Why?

Well, let’s see how this would work…

1. Joe Homeowner has a house that he bought for $500,000 with a loan from Fly-By-Night Subprime Lending, Inc.
2. The house is now worth $400,000
3. Joe, like everyone else, has lost a lot of equity in his home
4. Unlike other Americans who are responsible and ARE paying their mortgage, Joe qualifies for the Government to buy back his subprime mortgage, because he’s NOT paying his mortgage.
5. The Feds buy his mortgage for $500,000 and immediately give him a new mortgage at $400,000, which he may or may not be able to afford
6. So now Joe is happy, but only until he can’t make his payments again…
7. Good ole’ taxpayers absorb a $100,000 loss
8. Multiply by millions of upside-down loans.

So let me ask one simple question - Does this make sense to you??  I suspect there will be a lot of responsible homeowners who are diligently paying their mortgage who will be awfully pissed off that they won’t be getting THEIR mortgage bought by Uncle Sam and reset to current market value.

Don’t get me wrong - I am not against McCain, and this isn’t about one presidential candidate or another.  I’m simply saying that this plan does not make sense.  However, I haven’t heard either candidate or anyone in congress or the treasury or the federal reserve or the private sector suggest something that might actually work to solve this mortgage mess.  Although today, Barack Obama rejected McCain’s plan, and his economic adviser said that McCain’s plan would cause the U.S. Government “to massively overpay for mortgages in a plan that would guarantee taxpayers lose money, and put them at risk of losing even more if home values don’t recover. The biggest beneficiaries of this plan will be the same financial institutions that got us into this mess, some of whom even committed fraud.”

Let’s hope that someone is smart enough to figure out how to use that $700,000,000,000 to get the housing market back on track.

In the meantime, I’m proceeding under the assumption that for the forseeable future, people will need to do a short sale and get their lender to take the loss.  So if you know of someone who is underwater and stuggling to keep up with their higher payments as their loan resets to a higher interest rate, tell them you know a foreclosure consultant who can help.  I’d be delighted to talk to them.

Tags: bailout plan, financial crisis, mortgage bailout, short sales, subprime

Let’s End The Housing Crisis Here And Now … A Modest Proposal For How To Spend The $700BN

Even us “glass half-full” types have to admit the news these days is bad.  Any day Congress passes a $700BN and has to tag on only another couple billion or so of Christmas ornaments to get it passed, well, on that day, you know things were urgent, and they had to act fast.  Wooden arrow manufacturers, Caribbean distillers, and certain other recipients of congressional largesse pork may be quite happy now, but hopefully the remaining $700BN will be spend actually trying to solve the problem.

And that’s where my modest proposal comes in.

Fundamentally, this crisis is about housing values, or more specifically about uncertainty around housing values.  Behind most of the bankrupties, the bailouts, the CDO-thing-a-majiggies … lies a portfolio of mortgage loans whose value is … 3 cents on the dollar? A dime?  A quarter?  47 cents?  Nobody knows, and therein lies the problems.

Our fearless leaders have proposed spending the $700BN largely on buying these “non-performing assets.”  By some financial wizardry, the exact same folks who could not determine the value of these assets in the private market, are about to get hired by Uncle Sam to determine these assets’ values on the taxpayer’s dime.

So here’s what we do instead:  Let’s spend that $700BN buying not the mortgages, but the underlying homes themselves.  Let’s say homes in the US have an average value of $200K.  [Pause for my west and east coast readers to chuckle.]  $700BN divided by $200K is … 3,500,000 (three million five hundred thousand.)

That’s right.  With $700BN we could buy a couple of million homes.  We’d start by buying, say, 75% of the inventory on the market right now.  That should restore confidence in the market pretty quickly.

Presto!  Problem solved.

No tag for this post.

And Another One Bites The Dust…

Apparently at least a handful of government financial regulatory employees were doing something today other than figuring out how much money Wall Street needs to keep from further imploding…

The New York Times reports that JP Morgan Chase has taken over troubled lender Wamu.

What next?

No tag for this post.

What’s Happening In This Market? A Liberal Dose Of Mixed Metaphors To Help Us Understand It

Movies.  Shoes.  Phases.  What do they have in common?  All have been recently used as metaphors describing the economy or predictions of where the economy is going.

On the day that the Fannie and Freddie s$#@ hit the fan, Sherry Chris of Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate quoted Realogy CEO Alex Perriello, “I feel like I am in Imelda Marcos’ closet - the shoes just keep dropping.”  Indeed.

Fast forward a few days and we get the Bawld Guy, America’s foremost maxim-generating machine, reassures us that we ain’t all gonna die.  He’s seen this movie three times before, and the asteroid doesn’t hit earth.

Finally, Nikcolai Kolding, also of Better Homes and Gardens, brings out an interesting diagram explaining the phases of the real estate market:

["Sides", for the uninitiated, refers to each of the two "sides" of a transaction.]

The diagram suggests that transaction volume, not price, is the best leading indicator of a change in the market.  In a future article I’ll see how well our local data fit into this model.

No tag for this post.

Attention All You Crazy Drivers In The Fair Oaks Neighborhood: Those Traffic Circles Are There To Slow You Down

Having spent much of my life in former British colonies, I am well versed in various British-isms:  marmite (yuck), lifts (not elevators), sprinkling my words with extraneous u’s … and the correct use of roundabouts — or “traffic circles” as they’re commonly known on this side of the Atlantic.  Sadly, many of the folks here in Silicon Valley seem to have missed that part of driver’s ed.

To reduce the tempatation of using the streets of Fair Oaks (in Menlo Park) as a convenient shortcut to avoid delays on Marsh Road and on Middlefield Road, the local neighborhood installed roundabouts traffic circles a while ago.  Most drivers slow down as they navigate around these obstacles, but some of the more aggressive drivers see them as a handy and challenging obstacle course, careening around them at full tilt, seemingly on two wheels.  Both the fast and the considerate drivers, however, still don’t seem to understand the most basic rule of traffic circles:  if you’re in the circle, you have the right of way.  If you’re not in the circle, you don’t have the right of way.

Simple, really — or it should be.  Alas, nearly every day brings about a near collision as a rule-following driver makes a left turn around a circle, while a non-rule-following driver comes merrily towards him, with no obvious intention of yielding.

People!  Slow down!  Yield the right of way to cars in the traffic circle.

‘Nuff said.

No tag for this post.

Mortgage Mania 19 - The Jumbo Strikes Back

Amid all the celebration and hullabaloo associated with the recent drop in conforming interest rates as a result of the Treasury Department taking over management of GSE’s Fannie May and Freddie Mac, there has been scant analysis of the elephant in the room, namely Jumbo (aka non-conforming) loans that are part and parcel of home purchasing here in Silicon Valley.

The GSEs hold or have securitized nearly half — roughly $5 trillion — of all mortgages in the U.S., and in the current environment with private lender constraints, they account for the vast majority of all new mortgages in California.

 This bailout (oops, did I say bailout?) removes much of the risk to lenders of writing mortgages for under $729,000 locally, decreasing to $649,000 next year, because they can resell these loans to the government backed and now managed GSE’s.

But what about loans over $729,000? Well, Wall Street and the secondary market will still be willing to buy those that are considered low risk (excellent credit score, low loan-to-value ratio, verifiable income), but they will demand a risk premium for those loans, meaning that rates are likely to go up, taking us back to the bifurcated market for rates that we have seen in previous years.

 On his way to the SILVAR Golf Tournament yesterday, co-contributor and local mortgage banking hotshot Eric Trailer of Absolute Mortgage Bank in Palo Alto gave this quick analysis of where he sees rates going (paraphrased here):

If you know you can sell off a loan to a government backed agency, you have very low risk, so you demand a low interest rate. However, as risk increases you will demand a greater “risk premium” to hedge against not being able to sell that loan, or the buyer defaulting on that loan. Right now we are seeing investors who are willing to lend the 20% to take a buyer from a 20% down, 80% loan to a 100% loan, but at 15% with 5 or 6 points. That’s expensive money, which is why it is dubbed “hard money”, but it offsets the risk to the lender.

 Eric thinks we could see Jumbo rates heading to the 8 - 9% region, which is still lower than in the 80’s, but the difference between a 6% loan and a 9% loan on $1,000,000 is $2500 a month just in interest.

 Let’s do some math. If you have an 80% mortgage on a median priced home in Palo Alto ($1,921,214, source Altos Research). That is a mortgage of $1,536,971, and payments increasing from $7685 @ 6% to $11,527 @ 9%. That’s a lot of $4.25 a gallon gas!

 So, if you are planning on buying a new home and you need to borrow more than $729,000 you may want to get out there looking sooner rather than later.

 To learn more about the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and what it means to your home purchase, check out a new video featuring California Association of Realtors Executive Vice President Joel Singer at http://www.car.org/newsstand/video-js-gse. In “Fannie and Freddie: Why They Matter to You,” Joel explains the often confusing but critical role Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac play in the housing market in clear and concise terms.

Thanks for reading . . .

Tags: 2008 loan limits, 2009 interest rates, 4---mortgage-mania, bailout, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, interest rates, Jumbo Loans, mortgage bailout, treasury

Mortgage Mania 18 - Can You Say Taxpayer Bailout?

What The Government Seizure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Means To You

Unless you have been hiding under a rock the past couple of days, you couldn’t miss the announcement that the U.S. Department of the Treasury has placed government backed mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into a conservatorship. Under the terms of the deal, the federal government is authorized to take up to an 80 percent stake in the companies, and, as part of its duties under the conservatorship, will review both Fannie’s and Freddie’s financial condition quarterly, as well as inject money into the operations as needed. 
Tommy Fehrenbach of Stern Mortgage in Palo Alto had this to say about the Treasury Department’s move.

“To promote market stability, the companies will be allowed to buy more mortgages through the end of 2009. However, starting in 2010 the number of mortgages they own will gradually be reduced at a rate of 10% per year, eventually stabilizing at about $250 billion.”

 As part of this weekend’s action, both CEOs were relieved of their duties and Herbert Allison, former Merrill Lynch vice chairman, and David Moffett, former U.S. Bancorp CFO, were selected to lead Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, respectively.

The markets cheered the move with the NYSE and NASDAQ rallying on the news, and mortgages rates for conforming loans (under $650,000 in 2009) fell almost half a point.

 All great news, mortgage rates fall, and the housing slump is averted, right? Not so fast there partner . . .

In a statement released today by the California Association of Realtors (C.A.R.), concern over the long-term impact of the move was expressed with the following cautionary forecast:

“Without an institutionalized mortgage-backed securities market, mortgage capital eventually will be less predictable and more expensive, and adjustable-rate mortgages could become the standard loan for home buyers, as could higher down payment requirements. The 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage as we know it will no longer be readily available for most home buyers and may effectively disappear. The result could be a dramatic decline in homeownership rates in California and across the nation.”

C.A.R. is concerned that the Treasury, and Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s new CEOs, will overreact and change the mission and role of the GSEs. Wall Street and investors are understandably reluctant to buy mortgage backed securities (MBS) that are not either originated from or guaranteed by Fannie or Freddie.”

I added the underlining for emphasis because what nobody is talking about is JUMBO loans. Those mortgages above $729,000 (over $650,000 in 2009) that are part and parcel of almost ALL sales of single family homes here in Silicon Valley (the median home price in Palo Alto this week is: $1,921,214, courtesy of Altos Research).

In summary, while this is a good move for conforming loans, and the majority of potential homebuyers across the country, high-cost areas like Silicon Valley may once again be left out in the cold.

Stay tuned for our next edition of Mortgage Mania - The Jumbo Strikes Back

Thanks for reading . . .

 

Tags: bailout, California Association of Realtors, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, housing market, housing market turnaround, Mortgage, Palo alto housing market, silicon valley economy, silicon valley real estate

Good News About Real Estate in the Mercury? Well Sort Of

Long-time readers know that I do my newspaper reading online via the New York Times. In a throwback to a quieter time, I do subscribe to the San Jose Mercury News on Sundays as we like to peruse the articles and share witty banter about the headlines over morning coffee. In an interesting twist, I also receive the paper on other random days of the week . . . but I digress.

When I picked up the paper on Labor Day (Second Sunday?), the headline “Home Sales Raising Hopes” bravely attempted to be seen over the front and center HURRICANE HITS GOP main headline. What’s this I thought, positive news about the housing market from the Merc? Really?

I have grown weary and wary of the Merc and its drumbeat of foreclosure of the week, gloom and doom, and reinforcing that real estate is local, and my market in Palo Alto varies just a bit from south San Jose. If you don’t believe me, visit Altos Research and compare the chart for median home price over the last couple of years in these two cities. The results may surprise you . . .

The Merc got my hopes up with an intro and a couple of quotes from brokers saying they were expecting an upturn in sales in the Fall after activity was so low in the summer, and there is usually an upturn in the fall. There is some back and forth, and the article pretty much shot down the “fall uptick” conventional wisdom. Again, Altos to the rescue showing inventory and sales actually DO pick up in Palo Alto fairly consistently every fall before slowing down over the holidays.

To see the article on its entirety, click here to visit the Mercury online. For charts and stats galore, visit the Market Reports page on my website, now in Single Family and Condo!

Thanks for reading . . .

Tags: 2008 real estate market, home prices, Local information, palo alto home prices, palo alto market, San Jose Mercury

Next Page »

• Chat

• Subscribe

  Subscribe in a reader

• Market Stats

Copyright © 2008 3 Oceans Real Estate · Revolution News theme by Brian Gardner · San Francisco Commercial Real Estate · Log in